Over 0–100 km/h, I-PACE EV400 wins (4,83 s vs 5,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| I-PACE EV400 | Model S 85 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,83 s−0,91 s | 5,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,19 s−0,75 s | 13,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,36 s−0,81 s | 25,17 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 201 km/h−1 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,52 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,82 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | I-PACE EV400 | Model S 85 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,67 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 2,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,62 s | 4,46 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,83 s | 5,75 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,40 s | 7,39 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,23 s | 12,43 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,88 s | 20,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,19 s | 13,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,36 s | 25,17 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 201 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 696 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 208 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 362 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 599 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the I-PACE EV400 hits 100 km/h in 4.84 s versus 5.75 s for the Model S 85. At this point, the I-PACE EV400 leads by 0.91 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the I-PACE EV400 is doing 141 km/h against 137 km/h for the Model S 85. The gap is 0.66 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the I-PACE EV400 crosses the line in 13.18 s versus 13.94 s. The 0.76 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the I-PACE EV400 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 192 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the I-PACE EV400 finishes in 24.36 s versus 25.17 s, with a 0.81 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 201 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the I-PACE EV400 and the Model S 85 are governed to 200 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.52 kg/hp vs 5.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.41 seconds. The 0.91 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, I-PACE EV400 wins (4,83 s vs 5,75 s).
I-PACE EV400 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
I-PACE EV400: 400 hp, ratio 5,52 kg/hp. Model S 85: 362 hp, ratio 5,82 kg/hp.
I-PACE EV400: 200 km/h. Model S 85: 201 km/h.