Sur 0–100 km/h, P7 gagne (4,21 s vs 4,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| P7 | I-PACE EV400 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s−0,62 s | 4,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s−0,64 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 24,36 s+0,89 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 200 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,52 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | P7 | I-PACE EV400 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,09 s | 3,62 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s | 4,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,64 s | 6,40 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,67 s | 11,23 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 18,88 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 24,36 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 696 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 208 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 4.84 s for the I-PACE EV400. At this point, the P7 leads by 0.62 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 141 km/h for the I-PACE EV400. The gap is 0.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 13.18 s. The 0.64 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the I-PACE EV400 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.35 s.
Around 720 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the I-PACE EV400 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 30 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the I-PACE EV400 finishes in 24.36 s versus 25.24 s. The 0.89 s delta in favour of the I-PACE EV400 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the P7 is capped at 170 km/h, the I-PACE EV400 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 5.52 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.37 seconds. The 0.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, P7 gagne (4,21 s vs 4,83 s).
P7 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,21 secondes (simulation calibrée).
P7 : 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. I-PACE EV400 : 400 hp, ratio 5,52 kg/hp.
P7 : 170 km/h. I-PACE EV400 : 200 km/h.