Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 9,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Compass 4xe | HR-V e:HEV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,58 s−2,17 s | 9,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,62 s−1,55 s | 17,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,88 s−2,47 s | 31,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+30 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Compass 4xe | HR-V e:HEV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 2,19 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,72 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,25 s | 6,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,58 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,77 s | 13,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,78 s | 27,43 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 50,50 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,62 s | 17,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,88 s | 31,35 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 129 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 253 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 380 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-CVT (Honda i-MMD) |
Off the line, the Compass 4xe hits 100 km/h in 7.58 s versus 9.75 s for the HR-V e:HEV. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Compass 4xe leads by 2.17 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Compass 4xe is doing 116 km/h against 108 km/h for the HR-V e:HEV. The gap is 1.14 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Compass 4xe crosses the line in 15.62 s versus 17.17 s. The 1.55 s gap represents roughly 56 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Compass 4xe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 148 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Compass 4xe finishes in 28.87 s versus 31.35 s, with a 2.48 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Compass 4xe is capped at 200 km/h, the HR-V e:HEV at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.19 seconds. The 2.17 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe wins (7,58 s vs 9,75 s).
Compass 4xe goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,58 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Compass 4xe: 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp. HR-V e:HEV: 129 hp, ratio 10,70 kg/hp.
Compass 4xe: 200 km/h. HR-V e:HEV: 170 km/h.