Sur 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe gagne (7,58 s vs 10,20 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Compass 4xe | Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,58 s−2,62 s | 10,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,62 s−2,01 s | 17,63 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,88 s−3,68 s | 32,56 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+55 km/h | 145 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Compass 4xe | Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 2,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,72 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,25 s | 7,69 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,58 s | 10,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,77 s | 13,33 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,78 s | — |
| 0–200 km/h | 50,50 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,62 s | 17,63 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,88 s | 32,56 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 145 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Compass 4xe 2023 | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 159 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic |
Off the line, the Compass 4xe hits 100 km/h in 7.58 s versus 10.20 s for the Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160. At this point, the Compass 4xe leads by 2.62 s and sits roughly 40 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Compass 4xe is doing 116 km/h against 112 km/h for the Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160. The gap is 1.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Compass 4xe crosses the line in 15.62 s versus 17.63 s. The 2.01 s gap represents roughly 75 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Compass 4xe continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Compass 4xe finishes in 28.87 s versus 32.56 s, with a 3.69 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Compass 4xe is capped at 200 km/h, the Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 at 145 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.56 kg/hp vs 9.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.65 seconds. The 2.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Compass 4xe gagne (7,58 s vs 10,20 s).
Compass 4xe passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,58 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Compass 4xe : 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp. Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 : 159 hp, ratio 9,59 kg/hp.
Compass 4xe : 200 km/h. Captur E-Tech Plug-in Hybrid 160 : 145 km/h.