Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AAMGPHEVvsBM5Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsAMG · M5

Mercedes AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206 vs BMW M5 CS F90: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

saloon · 2024 vs 2021 · Methodology
MercedesPHEV

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

680 hp · 1020 Nm · 2,165 kg · 2024

VS
BMWPetrolFaster

M5 CS F90

635 hp · 750 Nm · 1,825 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

AMercedes AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

3.39 s

Gap0.37 sin favour of M5 CS
BBMW M5 CS F90

3.03 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureAMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206M5 CS F90Gap
0–100 km/h3.39 s3.03 s0.37 s · M5 CS F90
400 m standing start11.07 s10.82 s0.25 s · M5 CS F90
1,000 m standing start19.81 s19.94 s0.13 s · AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206
Top speed (electronically limited)280 km/h295 km/h15 km/h · M5 CS F90
Power-to-weight ratio3.18 kg/hp2.87 kg/hpbetter ratio · M5 CS F90

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

MercedesPHEVAMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPetrolM5 CS F90
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageAMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206M5 CS F90
0–30 km/h0.93 s0.91 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h1.56 s1.51 s · tight gap
0–80 km/h2.56 s2.37 s
0–100 km/h3.39 s3.03 s
0–120 km/h4.28 s3.74 s
0–160 km/h6.70 s6.21 s
0–200 km/h9.87 s · tight gap9.97 s
400 m standing start11.07 s10.82 s
1,000 m standing start19.81 s · tight gap19.94 s
Top speed280 km/h295 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Mercedes

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206

3,18kg/hpcompensated by −340 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power680 hpPending
Torque1020 Nm
Weight2 165 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
BMW

M5 CS F90

2,87kg/hpratio better by 0,31 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power635 hpPending
Torque750 Nm
Weight1 825 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the M5 CS hits 100 km/h in 3.03 s versus 3.39 s for the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE. Despite lacking instant torque, 635 hp of power compensates. At this point, the M5 CS leads by 0.37 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the M5 CS is doing 170 km/h against 169 km/h for the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE. The gap is 0.27 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the M5 CS crosses the line in 10.81 s versus 11.06 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE maxes out at 280 km/h while the M5 CS keeps accelerating towards 295 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.15 s.

Around 837 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 15 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE finishes in 19.80 s versus 19.94 s. The 0.14 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE is capped at 280 km/h, the M5 CS at 305 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.78 seconds. The 0.37 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSAudi

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs RS 5 Avant

BMWVSAudi

M5 CS vs RS6 Performance Avant

MercedesVSAudi

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs RS 5 Sedan

BMWVSAudi

M5 CS vs A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, M5 CS F90 wins (3,03 s vs 3,39 s).

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,39 seconds (calibrated simulation).

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206: 680 hp, ratio 3,18 kg/hp. M5 CS F90: 635 hp, ratio 2,87 kg/hp.

AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE W206: 280 km/h. M5 CS F90: 295 km/h.