Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 250+ with EQ technology wins (6,83 s vs 7,45 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| CLA 250+ with EQ technology | MONA M03 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,83 s−0,62 s | 7,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,00 s−0,48 s | 15,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,90 s−0,61 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+10 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | CLA 250+ with EQ technology | MONA M03 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,93 s | 2,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,23 s | 3,61 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,20 s | 5,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,83 s | 7,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,93 s | 9,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,59 s | 16,40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,18 s | 27,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,00 s | 15,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,90 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 335 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 055 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the CLA 250+ with EQ technology hits 100 km/h in 6.83 s versus 7.45 s for the MONA M03. At this point, the CLA 250+ with EQ technology leads by 0.62 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the CLA 250+ with EQ technology is doing 128 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the CLA 250+ with EQ technology crosses the line in 15.00 s versus 15.48 s. The 0.48 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the CLA 250+ with EQ technology continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the CLA 250+ with EQ technology finishes in 26.90 s versus 27.51 s, with a 0.61 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (210 vs 200 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the CLA 250+ with EQ technology is capped at 210 km/h, the MONA M03 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.56 kg/hp vs 7.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.92 seconds. The 0.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 250+ with EQ technology wins (6,83 s vs 7,45 s).
CLA 250+ with EQ technology goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
CLA 250+ with EQ technology: 272 hp, ratio 7,56 kg/hp. MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
CLA 250+ with EQ technology: 210 km/h. MONA M03: 200 km/h.