Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie wins (6,83 s vs 7,45 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
7.45 s
| Measure | CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie | MONA M03 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.83 s | 7.45 s | 0.62 s · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
| 400 m standing start | 15.00 s | 15.48 s | 0.48 s · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.90 s | 27.51 s | 0.61 s · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | 10 km/h · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.56 kg/hp | 7.60 kg/hp | better ratio · CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie | MONA M03 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.93 s | 2.16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.23 s | 3.61 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.20 s | 5.80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.83 s | 7.45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.93 s | 9.58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.59 s | 16.40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26.18 s | 27.72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15.00 s | 15.48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.90 s | 27.51 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 335 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 055 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie hits 100 km/h in 6.83 s versus 7.45 s for the MONA M03. At this point, the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie leads by 0.62 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie is doing 128 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.43 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie crosses the line in 15.00 s versus 15.48 s. The 0.48 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie finishes in 26.90 s versus 27.51 s, with a 0.61 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (210 vs 200 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie is capped at 210 km/h, the MONA M03 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.56 kg/hp vs 7.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.92 seconds. The 0.62 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie wins (6,83 s vs 7,45 s).
CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie: 272 hp, ratio 7,56 kg/hp. MONA M03: 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
CLA 250+ mit EQ Technologie: 210 km/h. MONA M03: 200 km/h.