Over 0–100 km/h, M240i xDrive F22 wins (4,45 s vs 5,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | M240i xDrive F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,45 s+0,85 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 12,67 s+0,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 23,03 s+1,55 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,89 kg/hp | 4,53 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | M240i xDrive F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,36 s | 1,23 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,02 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 3,32 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,19 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 15,84 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 12,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 23,03 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the M240i xDrive hits 100 km/h in 4.45 s versus 5.31 s for the E 400 e 4MATIC. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the M240i xDrive leads by 0.85 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the M240i xDrive is doing 147 km/h against 135 km/h for the E 400 e 4MATIC. The gap is 0.56 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the M240i xDrive crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 13.57 s. The 0.90 s gap represents roughly 42 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the M240i xDrive continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 203 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M240i xDrive finishes in 23.03 s versus 24.58 s, with a 1.55 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the E 400 e 4MATIC and the M240i xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.31 seconds. The 0.85 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, M240i xDrive F22 wins (4,45 s vs 5,30 s).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 381 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp. M240i xDrive F22: 340 hp, ratio 4,53 kg/hp.
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 250 km/h. M240i xDrive F22: 250 km/h.