Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,49 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| EQS 450 V297 | 530i G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s−0,19 s | 6,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−0,11 s | 14,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s−0,19 s | 26,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 248 km/h−38 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,45 kg/hp | 6,51 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | EQS 450 V297 | 530i G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,63 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,71 s | 2,72 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,57 s | 4,72 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,51 s | 8,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,04 s | 15,15 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,02 s | 26,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 14,67 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,38 s | 26,57 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 248 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the EQS 450 hits 100 km/h in 6.30 s versus 6.49 s for the Bmw 530i. The instant torque of 568 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the EQS 450 leads by 0.19 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the EQS 450 is doing 128 km/h against 127 km/h for the Bmw 530i. The gap is 0.09 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the EQS 450 crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 14.67 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the EQS 450 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the EQS 450 finishes in 26.37 s versus 26.56 s, with a 0.19 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (248 km/h), the Bmw 530i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the EQS 450 is capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw 530i at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.08 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,49 s).
EQS 450 V297 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
EQS 450 V297: 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp. 530i G30: 252 hp, ratio 6,51 kg/hp.
EQS 450 V297: 210 km/h. 530i G30: 248 km/h.