Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AEQSBEVvsBS90Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsEQS · S90

Mercedes EQS 450 V297 vs Volvo S90 B5 AWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

limousine · 2023 vs 2022 · Methodology
MercedesBEVFaster

EQS 450 V297

333 hp · 568 Nm · 2,480 kg · 2023

VS
VolvoPetrol

S90 B5 AWD

250 hp · 350 Nm · 1,795 kg · 2022

Result · 0–100 km/h

AMercedes EQS 450 V297

6.30 s

Gap0.28 sin favour of EQS 450
BVolvo S90 B5 AWD

6.58 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureEQS 450 V297S90 B5 AWDGap
0–100 km/h6.30 s6.58 s0.28 s · EQS 450 V297
400 m standing start14.56 s14.76 s0.20 s · EQS 450 V297
1,000 m standing start26.38 s27.11 s0.73 s · EQS 450 V297
Top speed (electronically limited)210 km/h180 km/h30 km/h · EQS 450 V297
Power-to-weight ratio7.45 kg/hp7.18 kg/hpbetter ratio · S90 B5 AWD

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

MercedesBEVEQS 450 V297
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
VolvoPetrolS90 B5 AWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageEQS 450 V297S90 B5 AWD
0–30 km/h1.62 s · tight gap1.70 s
0–50 km/h2.71 s2.57 s · tight gap
0–80 km/h4.57 s · tight gap4.64 s
0–100 km/h6.30 s6.58 s
0–120 km/h8.51 s8.89 s
0–160 km/h15.04 s15.63 s
0–200 km/h25.02 s-
400 m standing start14.56 s14.76 s
1,000 m standing start26.38 s27.11 s
Top speed210 km/h180 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Mercedes

EQS 450 V297

7,45kg/hpcompensated by −685 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power333 hpPending
Torque568 Nm
Weight2 480 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Volvo

S90 B5 AWD

7,18kg/hpratio better by 0,27 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power250 hpPending
Torque350 Nm
Weight1 795 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Geartronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the EQS 450 hits 100 km/h in 6.30 s versus 6.58 s for the S90 B5 AWD. The instant torque of 568 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the EQS 450 leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the EQS 450 is doing 128 km/h against 125 km/h for the S90 B5 AWD. The gap is 0.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the EQS 450 crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 14.75 s. The 0.19 s gap represents roughly 8 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the EQS 450 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the EQS 450 finishes in 26.37 s versus 27.11 s, with a 0.73 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the EQS 450 is capped at 210 km/h, the S90 B5 AWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.37 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSMercedes

i7 xDrive60 vs EQS 450

BMWVSVolvo

530i vs S90 B5 AWD

BMWVSMercedes

i7 M70 xDrive vs EQS 450

BMWVSVolvo

530i vs S90 B5 AWD

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, EQS 450 V297 wins (6,30 s vs 6,58 s).

EQS 450 V297 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).

EQS 450 V297: 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp. S90 B5 AWD: 250 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp.

EQS 450 V297: 210 km/h. S90 B5 AWD: 180 km/h.