Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AGLCvsBe:Ny1BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsGLC · e:Ny1

Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 vs Honda e:Ny1: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

family SUV · 2025 vs 2023 · Methodology
MercedesBEVFaster

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

489 hp · 800 Nm · 2,535 kg · 2025

VS
HondaBEV

e:Ny1

201 hp · 310 Nm · 1,677 kg · 2023

Result · 0–100 km/h

AMercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

4.33 s

Gap3.42 sin favour of GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology
BHonda e:Ny1

7.76 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureGLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254e:Ny1Gap
0–100 km/h4.33 s7.76 s3.42 s · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
400 m standing start12.66 s15.82 s3.16 s · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
1,000 m standing start23.35 s29.41 s6.06 s · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
Top speed (electronically limited)210 km/h160 km/h50 km/h · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
Power-to-weight ratio5.18 kg/hp8.34 kg/hpbetter ratio · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

MercedesBEVGLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
HondaBEVe:Ny1
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageGLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254e:Ny1
0–30 km/h1.17 s2.17 s
0–50 km/h1.94 s3.63 s
0–80 km/h3.21 s5.87 s
0–100 km/h4.33 s7.76 s
0–120 km/h5.77 s10.24 s
0–160 km/h10.06 s18.60 s
0–200 km/h16.35 s-
400 m standing start12.66 s15.82 s
1,000 m standing start23.35 s29.41 s
Top speed210 km/h160 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Mercedes

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

5,18kg/hpratio better by 3,16 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power489 hpPending
Torque800 Nm
Weight2 535 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
Honda

e:Ny1

8,34kg/hpcompensated by −858 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power201 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque310 Nm
Weight1 677 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology hits 100 km/h in 4.34 s versus 7.76 s for the e:Ny1. At this point, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology leads by 3.43 s and sits roughly 29 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology is doing 145 km/h against 122 km/h for the e:Ny1. The gap is 2.32 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 15.82 s. The 3.16 s gap represents roughly 125 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 201 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology finishes in 23.35 s versus 29.40 s, with a 6.06 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the e:Ny1’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology is capped at 210 km/h, the e:Ny1 at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.18 kg/hp vs 8.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.83 seconds. The 3.43 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSFord

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology vs Mustang Mach-E GT

MINIVSHonda

Countryman E FWD vs e:Ny1

MercedesVSXpeng

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology vs G6

HondaVSFiat

e:Ny1 vs 600e 156

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 wins (4,33 s vs 7,76 s).

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254: 489 hp, ratio 5,18 kg/hp. e:Ny1: 201 hp, ratio 8,34 kg/hp.

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254: 210 km/h. e:Ny1: 160 km/h.