Sur 0–100 km/h, 320i G20 gagne (7,05 s vs 8,32 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| V 300 d 4MATIC (long) | 320i G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 7,05 s+1,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 15,12 s+0,91 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 27,81 s+1,75 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 234 km/h−24 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,44 kg/hp | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | V 300 d 4MATIC (long) | 320i G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,60 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,77 s | 2,44 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,51 s | 4,84 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,32 s | 7,05 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,54 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,22 s | 18,13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 51,69 s | 33,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,03 s | 15,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,56 s | 27,81 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 234 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 312 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 460 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 320i | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320i hits 100 km/h in 7.05 s versus 8.32 s for the V 300 d 4MATIC (long). At this point, the Bmw 320i leads by 1.27 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320i is doing 119 km/h against 114 km/h for the V 300 d 4MATIC (long). The gap is 0.57 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320i crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 16.03 s. The 0.91 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 166 km/h versus 156 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320i finishes in 27.81 s versus 29.55 s, with a 1.75 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the V 300 d 4MATIC (long) is capped at 217 km/h, the Bmw 320i at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.44 kg/hp vs 7.93 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.08 seconds. The 1.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320i G20 gagne (7,05 s vs 8,32 s).
V 300 d 4MATIC (long) passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,32 secondes (simulation calibrée).
V 300 d 4MATIC (long) : 245 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp. 320i G20 : 184 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp.
V 300 d 4MATIC (long) : 210 km/h. 320i G20 : 234 km/h.