Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 8,07 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 4 Long Range RWD | 520e G30 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.73 s | 8.07 s | 1.34 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 400 m standing start | 14.92 s | 15.87 s | 0.95 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.24 s | 29.49 s | 2.25 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 213 km/h | 33 km/h · 520e G30 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.00 kg/hp | 9.31 kg/hp | better ratio · 4 Long Range RWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 4 Long Range RWD | 520e G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.92 s | 1.44 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.21 s | 2.58 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.16 s | 5.37 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.73 s | 8.07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.78 s | 11.61 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.38 s | 22.82 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 52.29 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.92 s | 15.87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.24 s | 29.49 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 213 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the 4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 8.07 s for the 520e. Despite the faster sprint time, the 520e is 6 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 113 km/h for the 520e. The gap is 0.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.86 s. The 0.95 s gap represents roughly 36 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 29.49 s, with a 2.26 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (213 km/h), the 520e never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 4 Long Range RWD is capped at 180 km/h, the 520e at 218 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.00 kg/hp vs 9.31 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.80 seconds. The 1.34 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 8,07 s).
4 Long Range RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp. 520e G30: 204 hp, ratio 9,31 kg/hp.
4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h. 520e G30: 213 km/h.