Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,75 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 4 Long Range RWD | 520i G30 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.73 s | 7.75 s | 1.02 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 400 m standing start | 14.92 s | 15.66 s | 0.74 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.24 s | 28.68 s | 1.44 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 231 km/h | 51 km/h · 520i G30 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.00 kg/hp | 8.37 kg/hp | better ratio · 4 Long Range RWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 4 Long Range RWD | 520i G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.92 s | 1.56 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.21 s | 2.75 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.16 s | 5.34 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.73 s | 7.75 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.78 s | 10.84 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.38 s | 19.96 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 37.89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.92 s | 15.66 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.24 s | 28.68 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 231 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the 4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 7.75 s for the 520i. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the 520i is 4 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 116 km/h for the 520i. The gap is 0.21 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.66 s. The 0.74 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 161 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 28.68 s, with a 1.44 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (231 km/h), the 520i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 4 Long Range RWD is capped at 180 km/h, the 520i at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.70 seconds. The 1.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,75 s).
4 Long Range RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp. 520i G30: 184 hp, ratio 8,37 kg/hp.
4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h. 520i G30: 231 km/h.