Sur 0–100 km/h, MG4 Long Range RWD gagne (6,73 s vs 7,45 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| MG4 Long Range RWD | MONA M03 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,73 s−0,72 s | 7,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,92 s−0,56 s | 15,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,24 s−0,27 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 200 km/h−20 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,00 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | MG4 Long Range RWD | MONA M03 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,92 s | 2,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,21 s | 3,61 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,16 s | 5,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,73 s | 7,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,78 s | 9,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,38 s | 16,40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 27,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,92 s | 15,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,24 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the MG4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 7.45 s for the MONA M03. At this point, the MG4 Long Range RWD leads by 0.72 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the MG4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.48 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the MG4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.48 s. The 0.57 s gap represents roughly 24 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The MG4 Long Range RWD maxes out at 180 km/h while the MONA M03 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.61 s.
At 1,000 metres, the MG4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 27.51 s, with just 0.28 s to spare. The MONA M03 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the MG4 Long Range RWD is capped at 180 km/h, the MONA M03 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.00 kg/hp vs 7.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.92 seconds. The 0.72 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, MG4 Long Range RWD gagne (6,73 s vs 7,45 s).
MG4 Long Range RWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,73 secondes (simulation calibrée).
MG4 Long Range RWD : 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp. MONA M03 : 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
MG4 Long Range RWD : 180 km/h. MONA M03 : 200 km/h.