Sur 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 gagne (7,45 s vs 7,48 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Megane E-Tech Electric | MONA M03 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,48 s | 7,45 s+0,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,59 s | 15,48 s+0,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,16 s | 27,51 s+1,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 200 km/h−40 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,11 kg/hp | 7,60 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Megane E-Tech Electric | MONA M03 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,16 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,61 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,62 s | 5,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,48 s | 7,45 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,92 s | 9,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,05 s | 16,40 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 27,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,59 s | 15,48 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,16 s | 27,51 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 768 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 208 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 581 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the MONA M03 hits 100 km/h in 7.45 s versus 7.48 s for the Megane E-Tech Electric. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric is doing 123 km/h against 126 km/h for the MONA M03. The gap is 0.05 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the MONA M03 crosses the line in 15.48 s versus 15.59 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the MONA M03 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the MONA M03 finishes in 27.51 s versus 29.16 s, with a 1.65 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Megane E-Tech Electric is capped at 160 km/h, the MONA M03 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.11 kg/hp vs 7.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.47 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, MONA M03 gagne (7,45 s vs 7,48 s).
Megane E-Tech Electric passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,48 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Megane E-Tech Electric : 218 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp. MONA M03 : 208 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
Megane E-Tech Electric : 160 km/h. MONA M03 : 200 km/h.