Sur 0–100 km/h, Countryman S ALL4 gagne (7,33 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Countryman S ALL4 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,33 s−1,02 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,37 s−0,82 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,99 s−1,42 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 236 km/h+21 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,50 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Countryman S ALL4 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,75 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,73 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,10 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,33 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,03 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,11 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,31 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,37 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,99 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 735 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Countryman S ALL4 hits 100 km/h in 7.33 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Countryman S ALL4 leads by 1.02 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Countryman S ALL4 is doing 120 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.59 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Countryman S ALL4 crosses the line in 15.37 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.82 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Countryman S ALL4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 167 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Countryman S ALL4 finishes in 27.99 s versus 29.41 s, with a 1.42 s lead.
Electronically capped at 215 km/h, the E-PACE P200 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.50 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 1.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Countryman S ALL4 gagne (7,33 s vs 8,35 s).
Countryman S ALL4 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,33 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Countryman S ALL4 : 204 hp, ratio 8,50 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Countryman S ALL4 : 236 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.