Countryman S ALL4
204 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 16 B-SUV 2022–2026, the Countryman S ALL4 ranks 14th of 16 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 16 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
204hp
300 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.3s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
7.2L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications MINI Countryman S ALL4
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 204 hp |
| Couple | 300 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7,2 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,3 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,845 mm |
| Height | 1,645 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,735 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 16 B-SUV, the Countryman S ALL4 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
B-SUV among the best in segment: 3rd of 16 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Renault Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 (1st with 4.5 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi SQ2 (1st with 4.9 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.2 L/100 L/100 (14th of 16 in Combined consumption)
The Countryman S ALL4 consumes 7.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Renault Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 (4.5 L/100).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Countryman S ALL4 stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 16 B-SUV marketed between 2022–2026.
Combined consumption
14eout of 16
0–100 km/h
3eout of 16
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q2 40 TFSI quattro S tronic 140 kW
190 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145
145 hp · 0-100 10.2 s
Mokka A 1.4 Turbo 140 6AT
141 hp · 0-100 9.5 s
Duster Hybrid 140
140 hp · 0-100 10.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Countryman S ALL4
Take the next step
Find a Countryman S ALL4 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
MINI Countryman S ALL4: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 16 B-SUV 2022–2026, the Countryman S ALL4 ranks 14th of 16 in Combined consumption (7.2 L/100, behind the Renault Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145), 3rd of 16 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Audi SQ2).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 leads in Combined consumption (4.5 L/100 vs 7.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Countryman S ALL4 vs Renault Captur E-Tech Hybrid 145 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.