Among the 13 B-SUV 2022–2026, the Countryman S ALL4 ranks 11th of 13 in Combined consumption (7.2 L/100, behind the Audi Q2), 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Audi SQ2).
Countryman S ALL4
204 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 13 B-SUV 2022–2026, the Countryman S ALL4 ranks 11th of 13 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
204hp
300 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.3s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
7.2L
/100 km
Tank
—L
Full specifications MINI Countryman S ALL4
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 204 hp |
| Couple | 300 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 7.2 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,3 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,845 mm |
| Height | 1,645 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,735 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 13 B-SUV, the Countryman S ALL4 ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
B-SUV among the best in segment: 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 7,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Audi Q2 (1st with 5.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Audi SQ2 (1st with 4.9 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.2 L/100 L/100 (11th of 13 in Combined consumption)
The Countryman S ALL4 consumes 7.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi Q2 (5.3 L/100).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Countryman S ALL4 stands against B-SUV
Comparison across 13 B-SUV marketed between 2022–2026.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the Countryman S ALL4
MINI Countryman S ALL4: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Audi Q2 leads in Combined consumption (5.3 L/100 vs 7.2 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Countryman S ALL4 vs Audi Q2 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.