Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 7,22 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne E3.1 | X1 xDrive20i F48 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−1,59 s | 7,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s−1,37 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,36 s−2,69 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+22 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,84 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,88 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne E3.1 | X1 xDrive20i F48 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,47 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,02 s | 4,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 7,22 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,59 s | 10,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,19 s | 18,68 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,12 s | 35,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s | 15,24 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,36 s | 28,05 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 178 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Cayenne hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 7.22 s for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. At this point, the Cayenne leads by 1.59 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne is doing 133 km/h against 118 km/h for the Bmw X1 xDrive20i. The gap is 0.78 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne crosses the line in 13.87 s versus 15.24 s. The 1.37 s gap represents roughly 54 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne finishes in 25.36 s versus 28.05 s, with a 2.69 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne is capped at 245 km/h, the Bmw X1 xDrive20i at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.84 kg/hp vs 8.88 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.89 seconds. The 1.59 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 7,22 s).
Cayenne E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne E3.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp. X1 xDrive20i F48: 178 hp, ratio 8,88 kg/hp.
Cayenne E3.1: 245 km/h. X1 xDrive20i F48: 223 km/h.