Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS E3.1 wins (4,37 s vs 8,67 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne GTS E3.1 | CR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s−4,30 s | 8,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,66 s−3,84 s | 16,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,38 s−6,40 s | 29,78 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 266 km/h+66 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,88 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne GTS E3.1 | CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 2,53 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,57 s | 3,73 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,00 s | 6,22 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 8,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,94 s | 11,62 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,45 s | 21,69 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,24 s | 84,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,66 s | 16,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,38 s | 29,78 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 247 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 660 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | CVT |
Off the line, the Cayenne GTS hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 8.67 s for the CR-V. At this point, the Cayenne GTS leads by 4.30 s and sits roughly 38 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne GTS is doing 142 km/h against 116 km/h for the CR-V. The gap is 2.82 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne GTS crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 16.50 s. The 3.84 s gap represents roughly 143 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne GTS finishes in 23.37 s versus 29.77 s, with a 6.40 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne GTS is capped at 270 km/h, the CR-V at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.88 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.59 seconds. The 4.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS E3.1 wins (4,37 s vs 8,67 s).
Cayenne GTS E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne GTS E3.1: 460 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp. CR-V: 190 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Cayenne GTS E3.1: 266 km/h. CR-V: 200 km/h.