Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne S 958.1 wins (5,73 s vs 8,31 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne S 958.1 | Terramar | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,73 s−2,58 s | 8,31 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,92 s−2,33 s | 16,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,21 s−4,20 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 255 km/h+41 km/h | 214 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,92 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne S 958.1 | Terramar |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,41 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,31 s | 3,44 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,14 s | 6,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,73 s | 8,31 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,71 s | 11,46 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,97 s | 20,91 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,63 s | 45,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,92 s | 16,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,21 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h | 214 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 065 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 810 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
Off the line, the Cayenne S hits 100 km/h in 5.73 s versus 8.31 s for the Terramar. Despite lacking instant torque, 420 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Cayenne S leads by 2.58 s and sits roughly 26 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne S is doing 133 km/h against 116 km/h for the Terramar. The gap is 1.60 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne S crosses the line in 13.92 s versus 16.25 s. The 2.33 s gap represents roughly 90 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne S finishes in 25.21 s versus 29.41 s, with a 4.20 s lead.
The Cayenne S features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Terramar’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 258 km/h, the Cayenne S never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.30 seconds. The 2.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne S 958.1 wins (5,73 s vs 8,31 s).
Cayenne S 958.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne S 958.1: 420 hp, ratio 4,92 kg/hp. Terramar: 201 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp.
Cayenne S 958.1: 255 km/h. Terramar: 214 km/h.