Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 wins (6,47 s vs 6,62 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne S 958.1 | Macan 95B.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,62 s | 6,47 s+0,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,74 s | 14,70 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,61 s−0,11 s | 26,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+21 km/h | 229 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,83 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,32 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne S 958.1 | Macan 95B.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,68 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,50 s | 2,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,76 s | 4,68 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,62 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,05 s | 8,70 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,55 s | 15,31 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,96 s | 27,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,74 s | 14,70 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,61 s | 26,72 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 229 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.47 s versus 6.62 s for the Cayenne S. Despite the faster sprint time, the Cayenne S is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 127 km/h against 125 km/h for the Cayenne S. The gap is 0.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.70 s versus 14.74 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Macan maxes out at 229 km/h while the Cayenne S keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 716 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Cayenne S overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 21 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne S finishes in 26.61 s versus 26.72 s. The 0.11 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne S is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Macan at 232 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.83 kg/hp vs 7.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.27 seconds. The 0.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 wins (6,47 s vs 6,62 s).
Cayenne S 958.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,62 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne S 958.1: 385 hp, ratio 5,83 kg/hp. Macan 95B.3: 252 hp, ratio 7,32 kg/hp.
Cayenne S 958.1: 250 km/h. Macan 95B.3: 229 km/h.