Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,46 s vs 5,59 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | ActiveHybrid X6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,46 s−1,14 s | 5,59 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s−1,07 s | 13,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,79 s−1,50 s | 24,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 278 km/h+42 km/h | 236 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,34 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,05 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | ActiveHybrid X6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 1,63 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,73 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,38 s | 4,33 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,46 s | 5,59 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,86 s | 7,13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,54 s | 11,38 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,21 s | 17,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s | 13,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,79 s | 24,29 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h | 236 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 780 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Seven-speed automatic transmission, electronic gear selector lever, shift paddles on steering wheel |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo hits 100 km/h in 4.46 s versus 5.60 s for the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo leads by 1.14 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo is doing 149 km/h against 141 km/h for the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6. The gap is 0.85 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo crosses the line in 12.59 s versus 13.66 s. The 1.07 s gap represents roughly 51 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne Turbo continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 206 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo finishes in 22.79 s versus 24.29 s, with a 1.50 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo is capped at 278 km/h, the Bmw ActiveHybrid X6 at 236 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.34 kg/hp vs 5.05 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 1.14 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,46 s vs 5,59 s).
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,46 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 500 hp, ratio 4,34 kg/hp. ActiveHybrid X6 : 485 hp, ratio 5,05 kg/hp.
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 278 km/h. ActiveHybrid X6 : 236 km/h.