Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,45 s vs 4,45 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,45 s | 4,45 s+0,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s | 12,60 s+0,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,82 s | 22,82 s+0,00 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 276 km/h | 276 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,17 kg/hp | 4,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 | Cayenne Turbo 958.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 1,24 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,38 s | 3,38 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,45 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,85 s | 5,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,55 s | 9,55 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,30 s | 15,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,60 s | 12,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,82 s | 22,82 s |
| Top speed | 276 km/h | 276 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 170 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo hits 100 km/h in 4.45 s versus 4.45 s for the Cayenne Turbo. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo is doing 149 km/h against 149 km/h for the Cayenne Turbo. The gap is 0.00 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo crosses the line in 12.59 s versus 12.59 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.00 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Cayenne Turbo and the Cayenne Turbo are governed to 278 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.17 kg/hp vs 4.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.61 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo 958.1 gagne (4,45 s vs 4,45 s).
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,45 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 520 hp, ratio 4,17 kg/hp. Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 520 hp, ratio 4,17 kg/hp.
Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 276 km/h. Cayenne Turbo 958.1 : 276 km/h.