958.1 · GENERATION 2012 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne Turbo

520 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 17 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 5th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 5th of 17 in Top speed, 4th of 17 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo S. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,18115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

520hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.5s

VMax 278 km/h

Cons.

13.8L

/100 km

Tank

99.934824L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Turbo

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureAtmosphérique
Displacement4,806 cm³
Puissance thermique507 hp
Combined power520 hp
Combined torque750 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP13.8 L/100km
Tank99.934824 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,5 s
VMax278 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,846 mm
Wheelbase2,896 mm
Width1,938 mm
Height1,712 mm
Boot60 L
Kerb weight2,170 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 17 E-SUV, the Cayenne Turbo ranks (top 5 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 5th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s), 5th of 17 in Top speed (278 km/h), 4th of 17 in Power-to-weight (240 hp/t). 5th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s), 5th of 17 in Top speed (278 km/h), 4th of 17 in Power-to-weight (240 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (1st with 282 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (5th of 17 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 5th of 17 in 0–100 km/h, 0.1 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (4.4 s).

Top speed: 278 km/h (5th of 17 in Top speed)

Top speed of 278 km/h. The segment reference reaches 282 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne Turbo stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 17 E-SUV marketed between 2010–2014.

0–100 km/h5e / 17
4,5 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 4,4 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Top speed5e / 17
278 km/h
Min 229 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 282 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S
Power-to-weight4e / 17
240 hp/t
Min 150 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 263 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne Turbo

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne Turbo: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 17 E-SUV 2010–2014, the Cayenne Turbo ranks 5th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 5th of 17 in Top speed (278 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S), 4th of 17 in Power-to-weight (240 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Porsche Cayenne Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (4.4 s vs 4.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Turbo vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.