Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT wins (3,73 s vs 3,96 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 | Mustang Mach-E GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,96 s | 3,73 s+0,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 12,00 s+0,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s−0,73 s | 22,87 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 283 km/h+83 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,92 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,33 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 | Mustang Mach-E GT |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,02 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,73 s | 1,70 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,97 s | 2,78 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,96 s | 3,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,67 s | 8,62 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,88 s | 14,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 12,00 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 22,87 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 235 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 860 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E GT hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 3.96 s for the Cayenne Turbo S. The instant torque of 860 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E GT leads by 0.23 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT is doing 152 km/h against 152 km/h for the Cayenne Turbo S. The gap is 0.15 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E GT crosses the line in 11.99 s versus 12.11 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Mustang Mach-E GT maxes out at 200 km/h while the Cayenne Turbo S keeps accelerating towards 283 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.
Around 643 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Cayenne Turbo S overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 83 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S finishes in 22.13 s versus 22.87 s. The 0.74 s delta in favour of the Cayenne Turbo S shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo S is capped at 283 km/h, the Mustang Mach-E GT at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.06 seconds. The 0.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT wins (3,73 s vs 3,96 s).
Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,96 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne Turbo S 958.2: 570 hp, ratio 3,92 kg/hp. Mustang Mach-E GT: 487 hp, ratio 4,33 kg/hp.
Cayenne Turbo S 958.2: 283 km/h. Mustang Mach-E GT: 200 km/h.