Over 0–100 km/h, Cayman S wins (4,89 s vs 5,63 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Cayman S | F-TYPE P300 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.89 s | 5.63 s | 0.73 s · Cayman S |
| 400 m standing start | 12.90 s | 13.69 s | 0.79 s · Cayman S |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.17 s | 24.35 s | 1.18 s · Cayman S |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 278 km/h | 250 km/h | 28 km/h · Cayman S |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.00 kg/hp | 5.32 kg/hp | better ratio · Cayman S |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Cayman S | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.36 s | 1.61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.26 s | 2.69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.70 s | 4.30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.89 s | 5.63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.21 s | 7.17 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9.92 s | 11.54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15.62 s | 18.21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.90 s | 13.69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.17 s | 24.35 s |
| Top speed limited | 278 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp | Aluminum block and heads |
| Torque | 369 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 320 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Cayman S hits 100 km/h in 4.90 s versus 5.63 s for the F-TYPE P300. At this point, the Cayman S leads by 0.73 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayman S is doing 147 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 0.59 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayman S crosses the line in 12.90 s versus 13.69 s. The 0.79 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayman S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayman S finishes in 23.17 s versus 24.35 s, with a 1.18 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the F-TYPE P300 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.00 kg/hp vs 5.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.14 seconds. The 0.73 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayman S wins (4,89 s vs 5,63 s).
Cayman S goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,89 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayman S: 330 hp, ratio 4,00 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
Cayman S: 278 km/h. F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h.