Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 4,96 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayman S (Manual) 987 | A110 Pure 252 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,96 s | 4,55 s+0,41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,91 s | 12,62 s+0,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,95 s | 22,69 s+0,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 286 km/h+9 km/h | 277 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,22 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,31 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayman S (Manual) 987 | A110 Pure 252 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,34 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,25 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,92 s | 3,55 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,96 s | 4,55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,41 s | 5,87 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,69 s | 9,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,82 s | 14,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,91 s | 12,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,95 s | 22,69 s |
| Top speed | 286 km/h | 277 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 350 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 103 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 Pure 252 hits 100 km/h in 4.56 s versus 4.97 s for the Cayman S (Manual). At this point, the A110 Pure 252 leads by 0.41 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 Pure 252 is doing 151 km/h against 148 km/h for the Cayman S (Manual). The gap is 0.24 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 Pure 252 crosses the line in 12.61 s versus 12.90 s. The 0.29 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 Pure 252 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 209 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 Pure 252 finishes in 22.69 s versus 22.95 s, with a 0.26 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (286 vs 277 km/h), preventing any comeback.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.22 kg/hp vs 4.31 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.17 seconds. The 0.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 Pure 252 gagne (4,55 s vs 4,96 s).
Cayman S (Manual) 987 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,96 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayman S (Manual) 987 : 320 hp, ratio 4,22 kg/hp. A110 Pure 252 : 256 hp, ratio 4,31 kg/hp.
Cayman S (Manual) 987 : 286 km/h. A110 Pure 252 : 277 km/h.