Among the 43 S 2009–2013, the Cayman S (Manual) ranks 41th of 43 in 0–100 km/h (5.0 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 32th of 43 in Top speed (277 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 32th of 43 in Power-to-weight (237 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).
987 · GENERATION 2011 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
Cayman S (Manual)
320 hp, 5,0 s 0-100 : among the 43 S 2009–2013, the Cayman S (Manual) ranks 41th of 43 in 0–100 km/h, 32th of 43 in Top speed, 32th of 43 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
320hp
370 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.0s
VMax 277 km/h
Cons.
10.9L
/100 km
Tank
63.973429L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayman S (Manual)
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,436 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 324 hp |
| Combined power | 320 hp |
| Combined torque | 370 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle Manuelle |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.9 L/100km |
| Tank | 63.973429 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,0 s |
| VMax | 277 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,376 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm |
| Height | 1,306 mm |
| Boot | 280 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,350 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 43 S, the Cayman S (Manual) ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.0 s 0-100 (41th of 43 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayman S (Manual) ranks 41th of 43 in 0–100 km/h, 2.1 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).
Top speed: 277 km/h (32th of 43 in Top speed)
Top speed of 277 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cayman S (Manual) stands against S
Comparison across 43 S marketed between 2009–2013.
0–100 km/h41e / 43
5,0 s
Min 5,1 s · Porsche Boxster SMax 2,9 s · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Top speed32e / 43
277 km/h
Min 267 km/h · Porsche Boxster SpyderMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Power-to-weight32e / 43
237 hp/t
Min 226 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)Max 444 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
F-TYPE P300300 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Z4 sDrive30i258 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayman 987 range
Generation 987 launched in 2006. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 987
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayman S (Manual)
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayman S (Manual): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 5.0 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayman S (Manual) vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.