Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 gagne (6,29 s vs 9,69 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.2 | Kuga EcoBoost 150 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s−3,40 s | 9,69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s−2,65 s | 17,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s−4,46 s | 31,30 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h+27 km/h | 202 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,71 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.2 | Kuga EcoBoost 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 2,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,41 s | 6,86 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,29 s | 9,69 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,77 s | 13,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,99 s | 26,92 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,23 s | 84,32 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,56 s | 17,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s | 31,30 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 202 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 859 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 607 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.29 s versus 9.69 s for the Kuga EcoBoost 150. At this point, the Macan leads by 3.40 s and sits roughly 31 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 125 km/h against 107 km/h for the Kuga EcoBoost 150. The gap is 1.85 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.56 s versus 17.21 s. The 2.65 s gap represents roughly 95 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 171 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.84 s versus 31.29 s, with a 4.45 s lead.
Electronically capped at 229 km/h, the Macan never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.59 kg/hp vs 10.71 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.19 seconds. The 3.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.2 gagne (6,29 s vs 9,69 s).
Macan 95B.2 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan 95B.2 : 245 hp, ratio 7,59 kg/hp. Kuga EcoBoost 150 : 150 hp, ratio 10,71 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.2 : 229 km/h. Kuga EcoBoost 150 : 202 km/h.