Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 wins (6,47 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.3 | CR-V | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s−1,88 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,70 s−1,56 s | 16,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,72 s−2,56 s | 29,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h+24 km/h | 205 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,52 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.3 | CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,68 s | 2,46 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,81 s | 3,62 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,68 s | 6,01 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,70 s | 11,13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,31 s | 20,41 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,71 s | 53,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,70 s | 16,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,72 s | 29,28 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 205 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 645 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | CVT |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.47 s versus 8.35 s for the CR-V. At this point, the Macan leads by 1.88 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 127 km/h against 118 km/h for the CR-V. The gap is 1.15 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.70 s versus 16.25 s. The 1.56 s gap represents roughly 61 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.72 s versus 29.27 s, with a 2.56 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan is capped at 232 km/h, the CR-V at 205 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.32 kg/hp vs 8.52 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.97 seconds. The 1.88 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 wins (6,47 s vs 8,35 s).
Macan 95B.3 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,47 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan 95B.3: 252 hp, ratio 7,32 kg/hp. CR-V: 193 hp, ratio 8,52 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.3: 229 km/h. CR-V: 205 km/h.