Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 wins (6,47 s vs 7,33 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan 95B.3 | Countryman S ALL4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s−0,86 s | 7,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,70 s−0,67 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,72 s−1,27 s | 27,99 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 229 km/h | 236 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,50 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan 95B.3 | Countryman S ALL4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,68 s | 1,75 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,81 s | 2,73 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,68 s | 5,10 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,47 s | 7,33 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,70 s | 10,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,31 s | 18,11 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,71 s | 33,31 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,70 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,72 s | 27,99 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h | 236 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 735 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT |
Off the line, the Macan hits 100 km/h in 6.47 s versus 7.33 s for the Countryman S ALL4. At this point, the Macan leads by 0.86 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan is doing 127 km/h against 120 km/h for the Countryman S ALL4. The gap is 0.38 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan crosses the line in 14.70 s versus 15.37 s. The 0.67 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Macan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 167 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan finishes in 26.72 s versus 27.99 s, with a 1.27 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (229 vs 236 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 232 km/h, the Macan never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.32 kg/hp vs 8.50 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.66 seconds. The 0.86 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan 95B.3 wins (6,47 s vs 7,33 s).
Macan 95B.3 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,47 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan 95B.3: 252 hp, ratio 7,32 kg/hp. Countryman S ALL4: 204 hp, ratio 8,50 kg/hp.
Macan 95B.3: 229 km/h. Countryman S ALL4: 236 km/h.