Over 0–100 km/h, Macan GTS 95B.3 wins (4,49 s vs 6,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan GTS 95B.3 | Mustang Mach-E RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,49 s−1,55 s | 6,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,61 s−1,78 s | 14,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,80 s−3,94 s | 26,74 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 272 km/h+92 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,44 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,01 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan GTS 95B.3 | Mustang Mach-E RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,21 s | 1,57 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,01 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,29 s | 4,39 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,49 s | 6,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,85 s | 8,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,62 s | 14,98 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,21 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12,61 s | 14,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,80 s | 26,74 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 960 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 886 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Macan GTS hits 100 km/h in 4.49 s versus 6.04 s for the Mustang Mach-E RWD. Despite lacking instant torque, 360 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Macan GTS leads by 1.55 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan GTS is doing 147 km/h against 129 km/h for the Mustang Mach-E RWD. The gap is 1.11 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan GTS crosses the line in 12.61 s versus 14.39 s. The 1.78 s gap represents roughly 76 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 206 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan GTS finishes in 22.79 s versus 26.73 s, with a 3.94 s lead.
The Macan GTS features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Mustang Mach-E RWD’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan GTS is capped at 272 km/h, the Mustang Mach-E RWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.51 seconds. The 1.55 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan GTS 95B.3 wins (4,49 s vs 6,04 s).
Macan GTS 95B.3 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,49 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan GTS 95B.3: 360 hp, ratio 5,44 kg/hp. Mustang Mach-E RWD: 269 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp.
Macan GTS 95B.3: 272 km/h. Mustang Mach-E RWD: 180 km/h.