Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.1 wins (5,28 s vs 6,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan S 95B.1 | i5 eDrive40 Touring G60 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s−0,84 s | 6,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,52 s−0,81 s | 14,33 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s−1,36 s | 25,96 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 251 km/h+58 km/h | 193 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,49 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,96 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan S 95B.1 | i5 eDrive40 Touring G60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,75 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,30 s | 2,92 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,87 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 6,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,01 s | 7,94 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,88 s | 13,56 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,13 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,52 s | 14,33 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s | 25,96 s |
| Top speed | 251 km/h | 193 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the Macan S hits 100 km/h in 5.28 s versus 6.12 s for the Bmw i5 eDrive40 Touring. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Macan S leads by 0.84 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan S is doing 138 km/h against 134 km/h for the Bmw i5 eDrive40 Touring. The gap is 0.65 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan S crosses the line in 13.52 s versus 14.33 s. The 0.81 s gap represents roughly 36 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan S finishes in 24.59 s versus 25.96 s, with a 1.36 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan S is capped at 251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 Touring at 193 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.07 seconds. The 0.84 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.1 wins (5,28 s vs 6,12 s).
Macan S 95B.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,28 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan S 95B.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,49 kg/hp. i5 eDrive40 Touring G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,96 kg/hp.
Macan S 95B.1: 251 km/h. i5 eDrive40 Touring G60: 193 km/h.