Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.1 wins (5,28 s vs 5,52 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan S 95B.1 | Cayman 981 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s−0,24 s | 5,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,52 s−0,12 s | 13,64 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s−0,09 s | 24,69 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 251 km/h | 253 km/h−2 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,49 kg/hp | 4,70 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan S 95B.1 | Cayman 981 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,30 s | 2,30 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,87 s | 4,02 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,28 s | 5,52 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,01 s | 7,16 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,88 s | 12,01 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,13 s | 19,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,52 s | 13,64 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s | 24,69 stight gap |
| Top speed | 251 km/h | 253 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp | Aluminum block and heads |
| Torque | 289 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 310 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed |
Off the line, the Macan S hits 100 km/h in 5.28 s versus 5.52 s for the Cayman. At this point, the Macan S leads by 0.24 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan S is doing 138 km/h against 136 km/h for the Cayman. The gap is 0.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan S crosses the line in 13.52 s versus 13.64 s. The 0.12 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Macan S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan S finishes in 24.59 s versus 24.68 s, with a 0.09 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 253 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The Macan S features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Cayman’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 251 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Macan S never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.49 kg/hp vs 4.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.30 seconds. The 0.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.1 wins (5,28 s vs 5,52 s).
Macan S 95B.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,28 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan S 95B.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,49 kg/hp. Cayman 981: 279 hp, ratio 4,70 kg/hp.
Macan S 95B.1: 251 km/h. Cayman 981: 253 km/h.