Over 0–100 km/h, Macan Turbo 95B.1 wins (4,65 s vs 5,77 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan Turbo 95B.1 | Cayenne Coupe E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,65 s−1,12 s | 5,77 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,94 s−1,07 s | 14,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s−2,03 s | 25,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h+21 km/h | 243 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,22 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan Turbo 95B.1 | Cayenne Coupe E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,21 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,02 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,46 s | 4,08 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,65 s | 5,77 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,29 s | 7,83 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,49 s | 13,74 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,41 s | 24,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,94 s | 14,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,62 s | 25,65 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h | 243 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 925 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Macan Turbo hits 100 km/h in 4.65 s versus 5.77 s for the Cayenne Coupe. At this point, the Macan Turbo leads by 1.12 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan Turbo is doing 143 km/h against 131 km/h for the Cayenne Coupe. The gap is 0.65 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan Turbo crosses the line in 12.93 s versus 14.00 s. The 1.07 s gap represents roughly 47 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan Turbo continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 182 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan Turbo finishes in 23.62 s versus 25.64 s, with a 2.02 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan Turbo is capped at 264 km/h, the Cayenne Coupe at 243 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 6.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.00 seconds. The 1.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Macan Turbo 95B.1 wins (4,65 s vs 5,77 s).
Macan Turbo 95B.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,65 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Macan Turbo 95B.1: 400 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. Cayenne Coupe E3.1: 340 hp, ratio 6,22 kg/hp.
Macan Turbo 95B.1: 264 km/h. Cayenne Coupe E3.1: 243 km/h.