Over 0–100 km/h, Taycan J1.1 wins (5,13 s vs 6,08 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Taycan J1.1 | i4 eDrive35 G26 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,13 s−0,96 s | 6,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,03 s−1,35 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,91 s−3,35 s | 26,26 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+40 km/h | 190 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,15 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Taycan J1.1 | i4 eDrive35 G26 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,53 s | 1,69 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,55 s | 2,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 4,56 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,13 s | 6,08 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 8,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,95 s | 14,28 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,43 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,03 s | 14,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,91 s | 26,26 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 190 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 402 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PSM) |
| Torque | 345 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 071 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Two-speed dog-ring rear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the Taycan hits 100 km/h in 5.13 s versus 6.08 s for the Bmw i4 eDrive35. At this point, the Taycan leads by 0.96 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Taycan is doing 148 km/h against 131 km/h for the Bmw i4 eDrive35. The gap is 0.71 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Taycan crosses the line in 13.02 s versus 14.38 s. The 1.36 s gap represents roughly 59 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Taycan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 179 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Taycan finishes in 22.91 s versus 26.26 s, with a 3.35 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Taycan is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw i4 eDrive35 at 190 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.15 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.27 seconds. The 0.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Taycan J1.1 wins (5,13 s vs 6,08 s).
Taycan J1.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,13 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Taycan J1.1: 402 hp, ratio 5,15 kg/hp. i4 eDrive35 G26: 286 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
Taycan J1.1: 230 km/h. i4 eDrive35 G26: 190 km/h.