Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F44 gagne (4,67 s vs 5,13 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Taycan J1.1 | M240i F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,13 s | 4,67 s+0,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,03 s | 12,78 s+0,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,91 s−0,13 s | 23,04 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 250 km/h−20 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,15 kg/hp | 4,49 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Taycan J1.1 | M240i F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,53 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,55 s | 2,21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 3,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,13 s | 4,67 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,30 s | 6,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,95 s | 9,80 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,43 s | 15,53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,03 s | 12,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,91 s | 23,04 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 230 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 402 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PSM) |
| Torque | 345 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 071 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Two-speed dog-ring rear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M240i | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw M240i hits 100 km/h in 4.67 s versus 5.13 s for the Taycan. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw M240i leads by 0.46 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M240i is doing 147 km/h against 148 km/h for the Taycan. The gap is 0.32 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M240i crosses the line in 12.78 s versus 13.02 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Taycan maxes out at 230 km/h while the Bmw M240i keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.10 s.
Around 713 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Taycan overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Taycan finishes in 22.91 s versus 23.03 s. The 0.13 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Taycan is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw M240i at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.04 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M240i F44 gagne (4,67 s vs 5,13 s).
Taycan J1.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,13 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Taycan J1.1 : 402 hp, ratio 5,15 kg/hp. M240i F44 : 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp.
Taycan J1.1 : 230 km/h. M240i F44 : 250 km/h.