Sur 0–100 km/h, Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 gagne (10,64 s vs 10,95 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 | 2008 PureTech 110 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 10,64 s−0,31 s | 10,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,87 s−0,27 s | 18,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,99 s−0,51 s | 32,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 175 km/h | 191 km/h−16 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,69 kg/hp | 10,45 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 | 2008 PureTech 110 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,93 s | 2,78 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,42 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 7,63 s | 8,01 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 10,64 s | 10,95 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 14,50 s | 15,23 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 27,54 s | 29,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 17,87 s | 18,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 31,99 s | 32,50 s |
| Top speed | 175 km/h | 191 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 143 hp | Inline-4 Atkinson cycle E-Tech (HR16) |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 528 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Multi-mode automatic (E-Tech) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 110 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual |
Off the line, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 hits 100 km/h in 10.64 s versus 10.95 s for the 2008 PureTech 110. At this point, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 leads by 0.31 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 is doing 107 km/h against 106 km/h for the 2008 PureTech 110. The gap is 0.16 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 crosses the line in 17.87 s versus 18.14 s. The 0.27 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 149 km/h versus 147 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 finishes in 31.99 s versus 32.49 s, with a 0.51 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (191 km/h), the 2008 PureTech 110 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 175 km/h, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.69 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 17.74 seconds. The 0.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 gagne (10,64 s vs 10,95 s).
Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 10,64 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 : 143 hp, ratio 10,69 kg/hp. 2008 PureTech 110 : 110 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 : 175 km/h. 2008 PureTech 110 : 191 km/h.