Sur 0–100 km/h, 2008 PureTech 110 gagne (10,95 s vs 11,20 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| HR-V | 2008 PureTech 110 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 11,20 s | 10,95 s+0,25 s |
| 400 m standing start | 18,27 s | 18,14 s+0,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32,81 s | 32,50 s+0,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 188 km/h | 191 km/h−3 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,75 kg/hp | 10,45 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | HR-V | 2008 PureTech 110 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,85 s | 2,78 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,77 s | 4,65 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 8,09 s | 8,01 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 11,20 s | 10,95 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 15,52 s | 15,23 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 31,19 s | 29,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 18,27 s | 18,14 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 32,81 s | 32,50 s |
| Top speed | 188 km/h | 191 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 120 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 290 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 110 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 5-speed manual |
Off the line, the 2008 PureTech 110 hits 100 km/h in 10.95 s versus 11.20 s for the HR-V. At this point, the 2008 PureTech 110 leads by 0.25 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 2008 PureTech 110 is doing 106 km/h against 105 km/h for the HR-V. The gap is 0.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 2008 PureTech 110 crosses the line in 18.14 s versus 18.27 s. The 0.13 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the 2008 PureTech 110 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 147 km/h versus 145 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 2008 PureTech 110 finishes in 32.49 s versus 32.81 s, with a 0.32 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (188 vs 191 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 188 km/h, the HR-V never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.75 kg/hp vs 10.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.22 seconds. The 0.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 2008 PureTech 110 gagne (10,95 s vs 11,20 s).
HR-V passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 11,20 secondes (simulation calibrée).
HR-V : 120 hp, ratio 10,75 kg/hp. 2008 PureTech 110 : 110 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
HR-V : 188 km/h. 2008 PureTech 110 : 191 km/h.