Sur 0–100 km/h, Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG gagne (6,61 s vs 8,18 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,61 s−1,57 s | 8,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,84 s−1,28 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,96 s−2,84 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+24 km/h | 211 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG | Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,70 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,79 s | 3,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,82 s | 5,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,61 s | 8,18 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,01 s | 11,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,89 s | 23,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,73 s | 58,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,84 s | 16,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,96 s | 29,80 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 211 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG (DQ381) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 777 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG hits 100 km/h in 6.61 s versus 8.18 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. Despite lacking instant torque, 245 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG leads by 1.57 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG is doing 126 km/h against 115 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170. The gap is 0.73 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG crosses the line in 14.84 s versus 16.11 s. The 1.28 s gap represents roughly 48 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 154 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG finishes in 26.96 s versus 29.80 s, with a 2.84 s lead.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.65 seconds. The 1.57 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG gagne (6,61 s vs 8,18 s).
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,61 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG : 245 hp, ratio 7,12 kg/hp. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 170 hp, ratio 10,45 kg/hp.
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG : 235 km/h. Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 : 211 km/h.