Among the 25 D-SUV 2021–2025, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG ranks 18th of 25 in Combined consumption (8.4 L/100, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 18th of 22 in Tank range (690 km, behind the Bmw X3 xDrive20d), 18th of 25 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition).
I · GENERATION 2023 → · FAMILY SUV
SEATICE
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG
245 hp, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 25 D-SUV 2021–2025, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG ranks 18th of 25 in Combined consumption, 18th of 22 in Tank range, 18th of 25 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
245hp
370 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.5s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
8.4L
/100 km
Tank
58L
Technical identity card
Full specifications SEAT Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,984 cm³ |
| Power | 245 hp |
| Couple | 370 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 8.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 58 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,5 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,745 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 191 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 25 D-SUV, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG ranks (in the bottom third) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 8.4 L/100 L/100 (18th of 25 in Combined consumption)
The Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG consumes 8.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X3 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 690 km (18th of 22 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG covers 690 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 25 D-SUV marketed between 2021–2025.
Combined consumption18e / 25
8.4 L/100
Min 14.2 L/100 · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
Tank range18e / 22
690 km
Min 577 km · Jaguar F-PACE SVRMax 1 333 km · Bmw X3 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h18e / 25
6,5 s
Min 11,8 s · Peugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8Max 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Macan245 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
X3 xDrive30i252 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
X3 xDrive30i252 hp · 0-100 6.4 s
X4 xDrive30i252 hp · 0-100 6.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG
Frequently asked questions
SEAT Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
690 km on a full tank (8.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 18th of 22 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 xDrive20d leads in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100 vs 8.4 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG vs Bmw X3 xDrive20d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.