Sur 0–100 km/h, Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG gagne (6,61 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,61 s−1,74 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,84 s−1,35 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,96 s−2,45 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+20 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,70 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,79 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,82 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,61 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,01 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,89 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,73 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,84 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,96 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG (DQ381) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | E-PACE P200 2018 | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG hits 100 km/h in 6.61 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG leads by 1.74 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG is doing 126 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.87 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG crosses the line in 14.84 s versus 16.19 s. The 1.35 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG finishes in 26.96 s versus 29.41 s, with a 2.45 s lead.
Electronically capped at 215 km/h, the E-PACE P200 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.12 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 1.74 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG gagne (6,61 s vs 8,35 s).
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,61 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG : 245 hp, ratio 7,12 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Tarraco 2.0 TSI 245 4Drive 7DSG : 235 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.