Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 8,62 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
3.04 s
8.62 s
| Measure | Model 3 Performance | Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.04 s | 8.62 s | 5.58 s · Model 3 Performance |
| 400 m standing start | 11.13 s | 16.48 s | 5.35 s · Model 3 Performance |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.49 s | 30.31 s | 9.82 s · Model 3 Performance |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h | 160 km/h | 101 km/h · Model 3 Performance |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.62 kg/hp | 10.57 kg/hp | better ratio · Model 3 Performance |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Model 3 Performance | Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.82 s | 2.25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.37 s | 3.76 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.26 s | 6.28 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.04 s | 8.62 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.03 s | 11.71 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6.97 s | 22.41 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11.20 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11.13 s | 16.48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.49 s | 30.31 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 160 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 769 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 844 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 125 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.04 s versus 8.62 s for the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 5.58 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 162 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW. The gap is 3.75 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.12 s versus 16.48 s. The 5.36 s gap represents roughly 193 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 20.48 s versus 30.31 s, with a 9.82 s lead.
The Model 3 Performance features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.62 kg/hp vs 10.57 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.70 seconds. The 5.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 8,62 s).
Model 3 Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model 3 Performance: 510 hp, ratio 3,62 kg/hp. Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW: 201 hp, ratio 10,57 kg/hp.
Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h. Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW: 160 km/h.