Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AModel 3BEVvsB216dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel 3 · 216d

Tesla Model 3 Performance vs BMW 216d Gran Tourer F22: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

saloon · 2024 vs 2018 · Methodology
TeslaBEVFaster

Model 3 Performance

510 hp · 769 Nm · 1,844 kg · 2024

VS
BMWDiesel

216d Gran Tourer F22

116 hp · 270 Nm · 1,480 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

ATesla Model 3 Performance

3.04 s

Gap8.32 sin favour of Model 3 Performance
BBMW 216d Gran Tourer F22

11.36 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel 3 Performance216d Gran Tourer F22Gap
0–100 km/h3.04 s11.36 s8.32 s · Model 3 Performance
400 m standing start11.13 s18.06 s6.93 s · Model 3 Performance
1,000 m standing start20.49 s32.93 s12.44 s · Model 3 Performance
Top speed (electronically limited)261 km/h192 km/h69 km/h · Model 3 Performance
Power-to-weight ratio3.62 kg/hp12.76 kg/hpbetter ratio · Model 3 Performance

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

TeslaBEVModel 3 Performance
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWDiesel216d Gran Tourer F22
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageModel 3 Performance216d Gran Tourer F22
0–30 km/h0.82 s2.34 s
0–50 km/h1.37 s4.04 s
0–80 km/h2.26 s7.84 s
0–100 km/h3.04 s11.36 s
0–120 km/h4.03 s16.16 s
0–160 km/h6.97 s33.00 s
0–200 km/h11.20 s-
400 m standing start11.13 s18.06 s
1,000 m standing start20.49 s32.93 s
Top speed261 km/h192 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Tesla

Model 3 Performance

3,62kg/hpratio better by 9,14 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power510 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque769 Nm
Weight1 844 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
BMW

216d Gran Tourer F22

12,76kg/hpcompensated by −364 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power116 hp3 cyl
Torque270 Nm
Weight1 480 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
Gearbox6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch)

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.04 s versus 11.36 s for the 216d Gran Tourer. The instant torque of 769 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 8.32 s and sits roughly 29 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 162 km/h against 102 km/h for the 216d Gran Tourer. The gap is 4.64 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.12 s versus 18.06 s. The 6.93 s gap represents roughly 219 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 141 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 20.48 s versus 32.93 s, with a 12.45 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The Model 3 Performance features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 216d Gran Tourer’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the 216d Gran Tourer at 192 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 19.19 seconds. The 8.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 216d Gran Tourer

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

BMWVSCitroen

216d Gran Tourer vs Berlingo PureTech 110 FWD

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,04 s vs 11,36 s).

Model 3 Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,04 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Model 3 Performance: 510 hp, ratio 3,62 kg/hp. 216d Gran Tourer F22: 116 hp, ratio 12,76 kg/hp.

Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h. 216d Gran Tourer F22: 192 km/h.