Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S 85 gagne (5,75 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model S 85 | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,75 s−2,49 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,94 s−2,17 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,17 s−4,22 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 201 km/h+21 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,82 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model S 85 | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,67 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,78 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,46 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,75 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,39 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,43 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,22 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 13,94 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,17 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed | 201 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 362 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 599 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
Off the line, the Model S 85 hits 100 km/h in 5.75 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. The instant torque of 599 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model S 85 leads by 2.49 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model S 85 is doing 137 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 1.27 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S 85 crosses the line in 13.94 s versus 16.10 s. The 2.16 s gap represents roughly 83 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model S 85 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S 85 finishes in 25.17 s versus 29.39 s, with a 4.22 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model S 85 is capped at 201 km/h, the XC40 B4 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 2.49 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S 85 gagne (5,75 s vs 8,23 s).
Model S 85 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,75 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model S 85 : 362 hp, ratio 5,82 kg/hp. XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
Model S 85 : 201 km/h. XC40 B4 : 180 km/h.