Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AModelvsBe-tronBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · e-tron

Tesla Model S Long Range vs Audi e-tron GT quattro: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2019 vs 2026 · Methodology
TeslaBEVFaster

Model S Long Range

670 hp · 660 Nm · 2,215 kg · 2019

VS
AudiBEV

e-tron GT quattro

577 hp · 830 Nm · 2,280 kg · 2026

Result · 0–100 km/h

ATesla Model S Long Range

3.86 s

Gap0.28 sin favour of Model S Long Range
BAudi e-tron GT quattro

4.14 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel S Long Rangee-tron GT quattroGap
0–100 km/h3.86 s4.14 s0.28 s · Model S Long Range
400 m standing start11.61 s12.36 s0.75 s · Model S Long Range
1,000 m standing start20.77 s22.46 s1.69 s · Model S Long Range
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h245 km/h5 km/h · Model S Long Range
Power-to-weight ratio3.31 kg/hp3.95 kg/hpbetter ratio · Model S Long Range

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

TeslaBEVModel S Long Range
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
AudiBEVe-tron GT quattro
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageModel S Long Rangee-tron GT quattro
0–30 km/h1.15 s1.13 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h1.92 s1.88 s · tight gap
0–80 km/h3.08 s3.08 s
0–100 km/h3.86 s4.14 s
0–120 km/h4.75 s5.47 s
0–160 km/h7.38 s9.25 s
0–200 km/h11.09 s14.74 s
400 m standing start11.61 s12.36 s
1,000 m standing start20.77 s22.46 s
Top speed limited250 km/h245 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Tesla

Model S Long Range

3,31kg/hpratio better by 0,65 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power670 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque660 Nm
Weight2 215 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Audi

e-tron GT quattro

3,95kg/hpcompensated by −65 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power577 hpPending
Torque830 Nm
Weight2 280 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model S Long Range hits 100 km/h in 3.86 s versus 4.14 s for the e-tron GT quattro. The 0.28 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model S Long Range is doing 164 km/h against 149 km/h for the e-tron GT quattro. The gap is 0.34 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Long Range crosses the line in 11.60 s versus 12.36 s. The 0.76 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Model S Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Long Range finishes in 20.76 s versus 22.46 s, with a 1.69 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model S Long Range is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the e-tron GT quattro at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.31 kg/hp vs 3.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.28 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of e-tron GT quattro
Audi RS e-tron GTAudi S e-tron GT

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSTesla

S e-tron GT vs Model S Long Range

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan GTS vs e-tron GT quattro

PorscheVSTesla

Taycan Turbo vs Model S Long Range

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan GTS Sport Turismo vs e-tron GT quattro

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model S Long Range wins (3,86 s vs 4,14 s).

Model S Long Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,86 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Model S Long Range: 670 hp, ratio 3,31 kg/hp. e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp.

Model S Long Range: 250 km/h. e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h.