Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X 100D gagne (4,63 s vs 4,94 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X 100D | SQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s−0,31 s | 4,94 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s−0,69 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s−1,52 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 257 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,62 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,12 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X 100D | SQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,24 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,63 s | 3,54 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,92 s | 7,19 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,80 s | 12,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,63 s | 19,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 257 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 532 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 967 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Model X 100D hits 100 km/h in 4.64 s versus 4.94 s for the SQ2. The instant torque of 967 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the SQ2 is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Model X 100D is doing 148 km/h against 133 km/h for the SQ2. The gap is 0.29 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X 100D crosses the line in 12.78 s versus 13.47 s. The 0.69 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X 100D continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X 100D finishes in 23.03 s versus 24.55 s, with a 1.52 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 257 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Model X 100D never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.36 seconds. The 0.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X 100D gagne (4,63 s vs 4,94 s).
Model X 100D passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,63 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X 100D : 532 hp, ratio 4,62 kg/hp. SQ2 : 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
Model X 100D : 250 km/h. SQ2 : 257 km/h.