Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X 100D gagne (4,63 s vs 6,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X 100D | EQS 450 V297 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s−1,67 s | 6,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s−1,78 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s−3,35 s | 26,38 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+40 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,62 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X 100D | EQS 450 V297 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,71 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,63 s | 4,57 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s | 6,30 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,92 s | 8,51 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,80 s | 15,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,63 s | 25,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s | 14,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,03 s | 26,38 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 532 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 967 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 568 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model X 100D hits 100 km/h in 4.64 s versus 6.30 s for the EQS 450. At this point, the Model X 100D leads by 1.67 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X 100D is doing 148 km/h against 128 km/h for the EQS 450. The gap is 1.10 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X 100D crosses the line in 12.78 s versus 14.56 s. The 1.78 s gap represents roughly 76 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X 100D continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 205 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X 100D finishes in 23.03 s versus 26.37 s, with a 3.35 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X 100D is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the EQS 450 at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.62 kg/hp vs 7.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 1.67 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model X 100D gagne (4,63 s vs 6,30 s).
Model X 100D passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,63 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model X 100D : 532 hp, ratio 4,62 kg/hp. EQS 450 V297 : 333 hp, ratio 7,45 kg/hp.
Model X 100D : 250 km/h. EQS 450 V297 : 210 km/h.