Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 7,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Performance | 320e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s−4,41 s | 7,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s−4,52 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s−8,85 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h+47 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Performance | 320e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,48 s | 2,37 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,37 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,05 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,91 s | 10,74 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,45 s | 20,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,08 s | 46,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,92 s | 15,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,92 s | 28,77 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 7.46 s for the Bmw 320e. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 4.41 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Performance is doing 168 km/h against 115 km/h for the Bmw 320e. The gap is 2.75 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Performance crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 15.43 s. The 4.52 s gap represents roughly 165 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Performance finishes in 19.92 s versus 28.77 s, with a 8.85 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Performance is capped at 262 km/h, the Bmw 320e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 8.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 4.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 7,46 s).
Model X Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model X Performance: 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. 320e G20: 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp.
Model X Performance: 262 km/h. 320e G20: 215 km/h.